密码:乐天堂国际娱乐找密码我的浏览
设乐天堂国际娱乐注册加收藏加书签 ______

乐天堂国际娱乐注册每天学英语背单词语法词汇口语阅读写作翻译寓言四级六级名著绕口令笑话外语乐天堂国际娱乐官网诗歌散文雅思商务

您所在的位置: 大耳朵乐天堂国际娱乐注册 > 文章资料 > 专题英语 > 双语阅读 > 正文

站内搜索:

小提示:学单词背单词请到大耳朵免费在线背单词系统
reset/['ri:set]/ n. 重新设定, 重新组合, 重排版 vt. 重新设定, 重...

低脂还是低碳水,怎么吃才能减肥?

本文属阅读资料

The endless array of diets that claim to help youshed pounds tend to fall into two camps: low fat orlow carbohydrate. Some companies even claimthat genetics can tell us which diet is better forwhich people.

声称能帮助你减肥的饮食方式不计其数,它们往往分为两大阵营:低脂或低碳水化合物。一些乐天堂国际_乐天堂国际娱乐官网_乐天堂国际娱乐_乐天堂国际娱乐乐天堂国际娱乐甚至声称基因可以告诉我们哪种饮食更适合哪些人。

A rigorous recent study sought to settle thedebate, and it had results to disappoint bothcamps. On the hopeful side, as The New York Timesnoted, people managed to lose weight no matter which of the two diets they followed.

最近,一项严谨的研究试图解决这场争论。研究得出的结果让两个阵营都失望了。乐观的一面是,正如《纽约时报》所指出的那样,两种饮食方式无论遵循哪一种都能减肥。

The study is worth a closer look to see what it did and did not prove.

这项研究值得我们去细究它证明了什么,没有证明什么。

Researchers at Stanford University took more than 600 people (which is huge for a nutritionstudy) aged 18 to 50 who had a body mass index of 28 to 40 (25-30 is overweight, and 30 andover is obese). The study subjects had to be otherwise healthy. They couldn’t even be onstatins, or drugs for Type 2 diabetes or hypertension, which might affect weight or energyexpenditure. They were all randomly assigned to a healthful low-fat or a healthful low-carbohydrate diet, and they were clearly not blinded to which group they were in.

斯坦福乐天堂国际(Stanford University)的研究人员挑选了600多名(这个数字对营养学研究来说堪称巨大)年龄在18到50岁,身体质量指数在28到40之间(25到30之间为超重,30或以上为肥胖)的研究对象。他们在其他方面必须保持健康,甚至不能服用他汀类药物,也就是治疗2型糖尿病或高血压的药物。这些药物可能会影响体重或能量消耗。所有人被随机分到健康低脂饮食组或健康低碳水化合物饮食组,但他们显然不知道自己属于哪一个组。

All participants attended 22 instructional sessions over one year in groups of about 17 people. The sessions were held weekly at first and were then spaced out so that they were monthly inthe last six months. Everyone was encouraged to reduce intake of the avoided nutrient to 20 grams per day over the first eight weeks, then participants slowly added fats or carbohydratesback to their diets until they reached the lowest level of intake they believed could besustained for the long haul.

在一年时间里,所有参与者以大约17人一个小组的形式上了22次指导课。这些课程一开始每周一次,然后拉开间距,到最后六个月变成每月一次。在前八周,每个人都被鼓励将应避免的营养物质的摄入量降低到一天20克,然后参与者慢慢恢复各自饮食中的脂肪或碳水化合物摄入量,直到达到他们认为可以长期维持的最低摄入量。

Everyone was followed for a year (which is an eternity for a nutrition study). Everyone wasencouraged to maximize vegetable intake; to minimize added sugar, refined flour and transfat intake; and to focus on whole foods that were minimally processed. The subjects were alsoencouraged to cook at home as much as possible.

每个实验对象都被追踪了一年(这对营养学研究来说这是很长一段时间)。所有人都被鼓励尽量多摄入蔬菜,少摄入添加糖、精制面粉和反式脂肪酸,并重点食用简单加工的全天然食物。实验对象还被鼓励尽可能在家做饭。

All the participants took a glucose tolerance test as a measurement of insulin sensitivity. Some believe that insulin resistance or sensitivity may affect not only how people respondto diets, but also how well they adhere to them. The participants were also genotyped, because some believe that certain genes will make people more sensitive to carbohydratesor fat with respect to weight gain. About 40 percent of participants had a low-fat genotype, and30 percent had a low-carbohydrate genotype.

所有参与者都接受了葡萄糖耐量测试,以衡量他们的胰岛素敏感性。一些人认为,胰岛素抵抗或敏感性不仅会影响人们对饮食方式的反应,还会影响他们对饮食方式的坚持情况。参与者还接受了基因分型,因为一些人认为,就体重增加而言,某些基因会使人们对碳水化合物或脂肪更敏感。大约40%的参与者属于低脂基因型,30%属于低碳水化合物基因型。

Data were gathered at the beginning of the study, at six months and at one year. At threeunannounced times, researchers checked on patients to see how closely they were sticking tothe instructions.

研究过程中收集了三次数据,分别是研究开始、六个月和一年时。研究人员分三次在不事先通知的情况下查看患者严格遵守指导的情况。

This was a phenomenally well-designed trial.

这是一项设计得极为出色的试验。

People did change their diets according to their group assignment. Those in the low-fat groupconsumed, on average, 29 percent of their calories from fats, versus 45 percent in the low-carbohydrate group. Those in the low-carbohydrate group consumed 30 percent of theircalories from carbohydrates, versus 48 percent in the low-fat group.

人们的确会根据分组改变自己的饮食。低脂组的人消耗的热量平均29%来自脂肪,低碳水组的人45%的热量来自脂肪。低碳水组消耗的热量30%来自碳水化合物,低脂组48%的热量来自碳水化合物。

They did not, however, lose meaningfully different amounts of weight. At 12 months, the low-carbohydrate group had lost, on average, just over 13 pounds, compared with more than 11.5 pounds in the low-fat group. The difference was not statistically significant.

然而,他们的体重减少并没有什么实质性的不同。在12个月时,低碳水组平均只减了13磅多一点,对比低脂组减少了超过11.5磅。该差异没有统计学意义。

Insulin sensitivity didn’t make a difference. People who secreted more or less insulin lost nomore or less weight in general on either a low-fat or low-carbohydrate diet. Genetics didn’tmake a difference either. People who had genes that might indicate that they would do betteron one diet or the other didn’t.

胰岛素敏感性并没有影响。人们分泌的胰岛素不论多少,在低脂或低碳水饮食中的减重差别都不大。基因也没什么差别。一些人有的基因可能意味着他们会在某类饮食中表现更好,而在另一种饮食中则没那么好。

In fact, when you look at how every single participant in this study fared on the diet to whichhe or she was assigned, it’s remarkable how both diets yielded an almost identical, curvingrange of responses — from lots of weight lost to a little gained. It wasn’t just the averages.

事实上,如果观察研究中每个单一参与者根据自己所分配到的饮食进食,人们会惊讶于两种进食都产生了几乎相同的曲线反应范围——从大幅减重的到轻微增重的。不仅仅是平均数。

Some have taken this study to prove that avoiding processed foods, eating more whole foods, and cooking at home leads to weight loss. While I’d like that to be true — I have advocated thishealthful approach in my Upshot article on food recommendations and in a recent book — that’s not what this study showed. Although that advice was given to all participants, there wasno control group in which that advice was omitted, and so no conclusions can be made as tothe efficacy of these instructions.

一些人用这项研究证明,避开加工食品、吃乐天堂国际娱乐天然食品并且在家下厨就能减肥。虽然我希望这是真的——在“结语”(Upshot)专栏有关食物的文章以及最近的一本书中,我都提倡过这种健康的方法——但本次研究并未表现出这一点。虽然所有参与者都得到了这一建议,但并没有未得到该项建议的对照组,因此,不能得出有关这些建议是否有效的结论。

Others have taken this study as evidence debunking the idea that counting calories is the keyto weight loss. While that wasn’t the main thrust of this study, nor the instructions given, participants did reduce their intake by an average of 500-600 calories a day (even if they didn’tcount them). This study didn’t prove the unimportance of calories.

有人用这项研究来驳斥卡路里是减肥关键的说法。虽然这不是研究的主要目的,给出的指示里也没有,但参与者每天确实减少了500到600卡路里的摄入量(即使他们没在计算)。这项研究不能证明卡路里不重要。

The researchers also asked everyone, not just those in the low-carb group, to avoid “addedsugars.” Therefore, we can’t really say anything new about added sugars and weight loss.

研究人员还要求所有人避免“添加糖”,而不只是只对低碳水化合物组有这个要求。因此,对于添加糖和减肥的关系我们并没有什么新消息。

What this study does show is that people who have staked a claim on one diet’s superiorityover another don’t have as strong a case as they think. It’s hard to overstate how similarlythese two diets performed, even at an individual level.

这项研究能够表明的是,那些主张某种饮食比另一种饮食更好的人,或许不像他们所想的那么有理有据。即使是在个人层面,这两种饮食的表现之相似是毫无疑问的。

It shows us that the many people, and the many studies, suggesting that we can tell whichdiets are best for you based on genetics or based on insulin levels might not be right either. Almost all of the studies that backed up such ideas were smaller, of shorter duration or lessrobust in design than this one. Granted, it’s still possible that there might be some genediscovered in the future that makes a difference, but those who think they’ve found it alreadymight want to check their enthusiasm.

它也向我们表明,许多人和许多研究认为我们能根据基因或胰岛素水平来判断哪种饮食对你有益,可能也是不对的。几乎所有支持这些想法的研究都规模较小、时间跨度更短或设计乐天堂国际_乐天堂国际娱乐官网_乐天堂国际娱乐_乐天堂国际娱乐乐天堂国际娱乐鲁棒性不足。诚然,未来仍有可能发现一些能产生影响的基因,但那些觉得自己已经发现了这个基因的人,可能需要再考虑考虑了。

This study was focused mostly on people who were obese, so people looking to lose just a fewpounds might benefit more from one diet or the other; we don’t know. It’s also worth notingthat the people in this study received significant support on both diets, so the results seen heremight not apply to those attempting to lose weight on their own.

这项研究主要关注那些肥胖的人,所以我们不知道想要减掉几磅体重的人会从哪种饮食上获益乐天堂国际娱乐。同样值得注意的是,这项研究的参与者不管采用哪种饮食方式都获得了大量支持,所以它的结果可能并不适用于那些试图自己减肥的人。

You should be wary of those who tell you that they know what diet is best for you, or thatthere’s a test out there to tell you the same. Successful diets over the long haul are most likelyones that involve slow and steady changes. The simplest approach — and many haveespoused it, including Jane Brody recently here at The Times — is to cut out processed foods, think about the calories you’re drinking, and try not to eat more than you intend to.

如果有些人对你说,他们知道什么样的饮食最适合你,或者有个测试能帮你测出来,对此你要保持警惕。缓慢而稳定的改变才最有可能保证长期节食的成功。最简单的方法是减少食用加工食品,留意你从饮料中摄入了多少卡路里,尽量不要吃得比你打算吃的多。很多人都赞成这种方式,包括最近在时报上发表文章的简·布罗迪(Jane Brody)。

The bottom line is that the best diet for you is still the one you will stick to. No one knowsbetter than you what that diet might be. You’ll most likely have to figure it out for yourself.

最重要的是,最适合你的饮食仍然是你能坚持下去的饮食。没有人比你更清楚你最适合哪种饮食。你很可能需要自己去弄清楚。

来源:可可英语

您是否对这篇资料想说点什么?欢迎评论或者纠错,或者提交填空题答案! 您也可以立即
下一篇:我国器官捐献数量稳增 居亚洲首位
上一篇:金融业进一步开放的12项举措
评录音:模仿共和党辩论 如何应对伊朗--网友香依侬的作品
评录音:CNN News 美国宣布将朝鲜重新列入支持恐怖主义国家名单 20171201--网友香依侬的作品
每日学:大耳朵FAITH口语课堂-天天学NO.319 “off”的活用
每日学:第2082英语智力大挑战【2015年9月15日】
每日学:极其罕见! 这对双胞胎一黑一白! 0216
双语阅读
高瞻远瞩
放眼全球
推荐资源
每天学英语乐天堂国际娱乐
想进步,请坚持参与每天学英语活动!
每天一词:
最新社区精华帖子乐天堂国际娱乐>>
  • 十七招让你躲过“电梯安全隐患”
    16:18
  • 六级核心单词 第5期:evaporate 0301
    09:25
  • 英国男孩篡改维基百科 成功混进演唱会VIP席 0301
    09:24
  • 第2739期看漫画学英语 奥迪电饭锅&勺 你值得拥有 0301
    09:23
  • 黑人母亲生下白人宝宝 几率只有百万分之一! 0301
    09:23
  • 阿联酋降罕见大雪 民众登山乐开花 0301
    09:21
  • Yummy world:我喝了一罐过期半年的汽水 还有救吗 0301
    09:21
  • 研究生考试词汇12000词---Lesson 03 Part3
    09:14
  • 考研英语阅读理解文章01-Pass the chalk
    09:04
  • 压力大咋舒缓 闻柠檬味15分钟有奇效
    08:01
  • 走遍美国教学版
  • 哈利学前班[英语儿歌]
  • 海绵宝宝 英文版
  • 风中的女王第1季
经典乐天堂国际方法乐天堂国际娱乐>>
文章资料目录导航
经典名著 四六级考试 IELTS雅思 听说读写能力 在线语法词典 乐天堂国际娱乐乐天堂国际娱乐英语一 乐天堂国际娱乐乐天堂国际娱乐英语二 生活英语 轻松英语 专题英语
双城记 宝岛
战争与和平
悲惨的世界
傲慢与偏见
读圣经学英语
八十天环游地球
考试乐天堂国际娱乐官网
乐天堂国际资料
历年真题
模拟试题
心得技巧
乐天堂国际方法经验
考试乐天堂国际娱乐官网
考试介绍
考试辅导
历年真题
模拟试题
心得技巧
英语听力
英语口语
英语阅读
英语写作
英语翻译
英语词汇
名词 冠词数词
动词 动名词
代词 形容词
情态 独立主格
倒装 主谓一致
连词 虚拟语气
职场英语
外贸英语
商务英语
银行英语
乐天堂国际英语
体育英语
房地产英语
会计英语
金融证券
医疗英语
计算机英语
公务员英语
实用英语
电话英语
旅游英语
购物英语
市民英语
宾馆英语
好文共赏
英语文库
名人演说
乐天堂国际娱乐寓言
谚语名言绕口令
笑话幽默 诗歌
笨霖笔记
CNN英语魏
实用九句
双语阅读
发音讲解
分类词汇
免责声明:本站只提供资源播放平台,如果站内部分资源侵犯您的权益,请您告知,我们会立即处理。
Copyright © 2010-2017 大耳朵英语  京乐天堂国际10010568号 | 京公网安备 11010802020324号

微信扫一扫手机学英语 关闭
微博扫一扫手机学英语 关闭
QQ扫一扫手机学英语 关闭
0.225611s